Thursday, January 1, 2009

The what and when of Collection Agencies.

By JR Rooney

Debt collection agencies act on behalf of creditors to collect debts when the creditors don't have the time or resources to chase down severely overdue debts for themselves. Collection agencies specialize in this kind of work which means they have staff that specializes in debt collection, which covers a broad range of legal and negotiating skills, and a streamlined process for pursuing accounts.

As a company that is owed money you can hire a collection agency. They get assigned the task of collecting the account. Most agencies, when successful will take a small portion of the collected amount. Be careful of firms that want money upfront.

Some agencies will buy the accounts but most will not. The debtor does not actually owe the collection agency any money but they still owe the debt to the original creditor. By law the collection agency must provide, if asked, proof of the debt (known as validation of debt) that they have been assigned the account for collections on behalf of the creditor.

Purchasing old debts is a big business. The collection agency is hoping that you would rather pay than get sued.

All collection agencies are governed by federal laws and no collection agency is, or wishes to be in, the business of collecting fraudulent debts. However, when acting on behalf of a legitimate creditor they will take all legal steps to enforce the collection of badly overdue accounts, if necessary going to court on behalf of the creditor.

This is when you hire a debt collection agency -

the debtor has the ability to pay but ignores you the debt is past due there is not a valid dispute

A debt collection company will attempt to collect via a letter writing campaign which can be effective, if occasionally slow, but it may not lead to recovery when -

the debtor has or thinks he or she has a defense the amount owed is disputed there is an unrelated adverse claim the debtor's solvency is in doubt or there is the possibility of bankruptcy there is security to recover or a possible prejudgment remedy

If any of these circumstances occur, the creditor should for their own legal protection retain control of critical decisions such as if and when to litigate, what attorney to retain and any other decisions made prior to or during litigation. This is particularly important where the creditor has a long term interest in retaining the customer as his client. Not retaining control of critical decisions and proceeding without the advice of an attorney could leave the creditor open to adverse legal liability.

The option exists where the creditor does not wish to do additional business and the creditor is not interested in the outcome of a debt collection, beyond getting his money, to sell the debt to a debt purchaser. - 16747

About the Author: